The Defendant Sellers sent a single Notice of Arbitration, for disputes arising from two separate FOB contracts containing identical arbitration clauses (GAFTA Rule 125), in which Sellers also questioned if the Claimant Buyers would “accept the two contracts/disputes be adjudicated under a single arbitration”. The Buyers subsequently challenged GAFTA’s award for lack of jurisdiction, disputing the single Notice was valid commencement of two arbitrations. The Court held it was because the Notice identified both disputes, s.14 AA should be interpreted “broadly and flexibly” with substance over form, and a reasonable reading of Sellers’ question showed an intention to commence both.
LLC Agronefteprodukt v Ameropa AG [2021] EWHC 3474 – 21 December 2021 (Sir William Blair)
Previous
Previous
Navig8 Chemicals Pool Inc v Aeturnum Energy International Pte Ltd (Consequential Matters) [2021] EWHC 3435 – 20 December 2021 (Christopher Hancock QC)
Next
Next