Case Summaries

Join our Case Summary Mailing List

Want to receive our weekly Case Summary direct to your inbox? Click below!

Archive
Court of Appeal Louise Glover Court of Appeal Louise Glover

Oceanus Capital SARL v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA (The "Vyssos") [2026] EWCA Civ 863

The Vyssos, trading in Ukrainian waters, struck a mine and became a CTL. The owners’ war risk insurance did not respond, due to breach of trading warranties. The Court upheld the rulings that the same breach by owners constituted an insured peril under Oceanus’ (mortgagees) MII policy; the loss was fortuitous (Oceanus’ consent having been induced by a forged AWR cover note), and they were able to recover under their MII policy.

Read the full judgement here.

Read More
Court of Appeal Louise Glover Court of Appeal Louise Glover

Tonzip Maritime (Singapore) PTE Ltd v 2 Rivers PTE Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 641

Following Owners’ refusal under a C/P incorporating an ‘EPS’ sanctions clause, to load a cargo of oil at a Russian Black Sea port for the Mediterranean, the High Court held that Owners were in repudiatory breach, having no reasonable grounds to apprehend that Sanctioned individuals retained roles within the proposed Shippers. The CA reversed that ruling, finding that the information supplied by Charterers and obtained independently by Owners did leave room for a reasonable apprehension that Sanctioned individuals remained involved, and justified their refusal.

Read the full judgement here.

Read More
Court of Appeal Louise Glover Court of Appeal Louise Glover

Skyros Maritime Corporation & Anor v  HapagLloyd AG (Re ‘SKYROS’ & ‘AGIOS MINAS’) [2025] EWCA Civ 1529

Two Vessels under T/Cs, had been sold. with MOA deliveries on set dates after latest T/C redeliveries. On assumed facts that (i) T/C redelivery was respectively 2 and 4 days late and (ii) Owners never intended to trade the Vessels post T/Cs, a Tribunal had nonetheless held that Owners were entitled to damages for the overrun, based on (increased) market rates. The High Court overturned, substituting only nominal damages. The C.A. restored the Tribunal’s Award, ruling that the MoAs were “collateral” and did not affect the usual compensatory basis of damages. Alternatively, “user” damages (here based on Charterers’ continued use of the Vessels) would achieve the same result.

 

Read the full judgment here.

Read More
Court of Appeal Lucy Arghyrakis Court of Appeal Lucy Arghyrakis

MS Amlin Marine NV v King Trader Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1387

Time Chartereres, Bintan Mining Corporation, were held by the Tribunal to be responsible for the grounding of the Solomon Trader and liable to Owners for approximately USD $47m. Before the award could be satisfied, Time Charterers were wound up under the Insolvency Act. The Court of Appeal upheld the “pay to be paid” provision in Amlin’s Charterers’ Marine Policy, such that it did not respond to Owners’ claim.

 

Read the full judgment here.

Read More
Court of Appeal Sofia Paradoulaki Court of Appeal Sofia Paradoulaki

Songa Product and Chemical Tankers III AS v Kairos Shipping II LLC [2025] EWCA Civ 1227

Songa, Owners under a bareboat c/p on the Barecon 2001 form, terminated early (legitimately) whilst the Vessel was at Stockton USA but required redelivery at Trogir, Croatia. Cl.29 specified repossession “at current or next port…or at a place convenient to [Owners]…[who]…shall arrange…to board as soon as reasonably practicable…[when]…Vessel shall be deemed to be repossessed”. Charterers complied but claimed damages. The Tribunal ruled that Trogir was “objectively convenient to Owners” and valid. Both the High Court and the C.A. disagreed, finding that if the Vessel is in port when termination occurs, the sentences of Cl.29 when read together mean that Owners must repossess at that port unless impracticable or impossible.

 

Read the full judgment here.

Read More
Court of Appeal Filippos Nasioutzik Court of Appeal Filippos Nasioutzik

Orion Shipping and Trading LLC v Great Asia Maritime Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1210

Under an NSF 2012 Orion agreed to sell the Lila Lisbon to Great Asia for USD 15 million. The cancelling date was 15 October 2021. Delivery was delayed due to Orion’s negligent failure to arrange crew flights, and a berthing slot was missed. Buyers terminated and claimed USD 1.85m loss of bargain. The Tribunal upheld the claim, but the High Court disagreed, holding Clause 14 didn’t permit such damages absent a repudiatory breach. The Court of Appeal decided that Sellers were required to exercise due diligence to meet the cancelling date. Given Orion’s proven negligence, Buyers were entitled to compensation including loss of bargain.

 

Read the full judgment here.

Read More